Orang searches 800+ transcribed episodes from 35 leading GTM podcasts to find the benchmarks, playbooks and ideas behind your question - from operators who have actually done the work and with every answer linked back to the source.
Free. Ask Orang plus the Monday email. Unsubscribe whenever. Already have access? Open Ask Orang →
Transcribed through 28 Sep. New episodes land every week, and subscribers can request one from inside Ask Orang.
Four moments where a general assistant gives you an average and Orang gives you an operator, a number and the episode it came from.
Someone asks what good looks like and you would rather not guess, or quote a number you cannot source.
“What win rates are B2B SaaS teams actually reporting?” →Pricing, comp, territories, the sales process. Someone has already tried it and said how it went.
“How have teams successfully moved upmarket to enterprise?” →A best practice gets proposed in a meeting. Find out who disagrees with it, and on what grounds.
“What do GTM leaders disagree about on SDR efficiency?” →You know someone covered this. You cannot remember who, which show, or what the numbers were.
“Someone changed sales comp after moving to usage-based pricing. Who?” →Every show that published gets scored against what a revenue leader actually needs. Three make the email. The rest get a line, so you know what you skipped.
No show has a standing slot. Every episode clears the same bar, so a strong episode from a show you have never heard of beats a thin one from a name you have.
A week of three playbooks is a failed week. The email mixes how to run the play with how the engine is built, and the market read goes to the full write-up.
A general assistant will tell you a good close rate is 20-30%. Ask Orang tells you Kyle Norton took Owner.com from 38% to 53% in a quarter, how he did it, and which episode he said it in.
You get the person, their company and their own number, not a range assembled from everything ever written about the topic.
Where operators disagree, you get the disagreement and who is on each side, instead of a consensus that does not exist.
Ask something the shows have not covered and it tells you so. That is what makes the rest worth trusting.
A real answer, unedited. Every bracketed number is the episode behind that sentence.
Keep scrolling and you get the receipts: how the whole of Orang splits on the question - counted across every episode, never asserted - the operators on each side, and one card per episode the answer actually used.
A second pass re-reads every sentence against its sources and deletes anything they do not support. Confident prose is not evidence.
A number from a single company is attributed to that company. One person's estimate is attributed to that person, by name.
Ask something the shows have not covered and it says so, instead of assembling a plausible answer out of nothing.
"Orang does not cover this." What you get when the shows have not discussed something. We think that is worth more than a confident guess.
I'm Stefan. I have spent over five years in RevOps. As the first GTM hire at Sastrify I helped scale the org from €500K to €10M+ ARR, and as a consultant I have worked with PE-backed companies like Lucanet and T-PRO, and fast-growing AI startups like Voize.
The podcasts are genuinely good, and there are far too many of them to keep up with. So I built the thing I wanted: someone to listen to all of it, tell me what actually mattered, and keep a record I could search when the question came up three months later. Then people asked to be added.
Free. Ask Orang plus the Monday email.